Case LawHigh Court › Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.5047 OF 2020(E) PETITIONER: LALLY JENSON,VATTAPARAMBATH HOUSE, MAVELI NAGAR, THRIKKAKARA NORTHVILLAGE, ERNAKULAM-682 033. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-18 WARD-1(3), NON CORPORATE RANGE-1, 3RD FLOOR, C.R. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-36. JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 24th day of February 2020 The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 stay application within aperiod of two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impugned order in the appeal shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 DATED 1.12.2016. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2011-12 DATED 29.12.2016. EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.2.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 28.1.2020. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan