Case LawHigh Court › Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra Society...

Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra Society Panjabari Road Batahguli Guwahati Assam v. The Union Of India And 3 Ors

High Court 09 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra Society Panjabari Road Batahguli Guwahati Assam v. The Union Of India And 3 Ors
Date of order
09 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra Society Panjabari Road Batahguli Guwahati Assam v. The Union Of India And 3 Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the above and after going through the contents of thisapplication, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer for condonation of delay.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

GAHC010078612025 2025:GAU-AS:4528 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1203/2025 SRIMANTA SANKARDEVA KALAKSHETRA SOCIETY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECY. HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PANJABARI ROAD, BATAHGULI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 781037 2: THE SECRETARY SRIMANTA SANKARDEVA KALAKSHETRA SOCIETY PANJABARI ROAD BATAHGULI GUWAHATI ASSAM 78103 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS, REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE INCOME TAX DEPTT., OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), EXEMPTION, GUWAHATI. 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) KOLKATA. 3:THE ASSESSING OFFICER-3 WARD 2(3) EXEMPTION AAYAKAR BHAWAN G.S. ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI 781005 4:INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3) EXEMPTION GUWAHATI AAYAKAR BHAWAN G.S. ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI 78100 For the applicant : Mr. B. Gogoi, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. S.C. Keyal, S.C. Income Tax – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR --10042025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) The matter comes up for consideration of IA(Civil) No.1203/2025 with theprayer for condonation of delay of 6 days in filing the connected income taxappeal. Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax is appearing onbehalf of the respondents, i.e. officials of the Income Tax Department. Service is, therefore, complete. Learned counsel for the respondents has not seriously opposed theapplication for condonation of delay. In view of the above and after going through the contents of thisapplication, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 6 days in filing the connected income tax appealis condoned. The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected income tax appeal and listthe same before this Court for admission after 3 (three) weeks showing thename of Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax as the counselfor the respondents in the cause list. JUDGECHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan