Case LawHigh Court › S.santhanakrishnan v. The Deputy Commiss...

S.santhanakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle Ii,Cuddalore

High Court 01 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
S.santhanakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle Ii,Cuddalore
Date of order
01 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In S.santhanakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle Ii,Cuddalore, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE: 01.07.2021 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMYAND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.Santhanakrishnan,Prop. Lakshmi Agro,74, Cuddalore Road,Panruti - 607 106.... Appellant v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle II,Cuddalore.... Respondent Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras, "C" Bench, dated 06.05.2009 in ITA.No.816/Mds/2007 forthe Assessment Year 2002-2003. Preferred against the order ofthe commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XI, Chennai dated08/01/2007 made in Tr.No.473/2005-2006 and ITA.No.179/2006-2007.Against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle II Cuddalore Dated 30/09/2005 made in PAN NO AAUPS8398FG.I.No.217395 (Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.) When the Tax Case Appeal was listed for hearing on22.02.2021, the learned cousnel, who had entered appeance onbehalf of the appellant represented that he had returned thepapers to the appellant-assessee for engaging some othercounsel. However, no counsel had entered appearance on behalfof the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directed to sendthe drafted notice to the appellant which was duly served on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 08.03.2021. When the matter was listed on 29.06.2021, noneappeared for the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directedto list the matter on 01.07.2021 under the caption fordismissal. 2. Though the matter has been listed under the caption fordismissal, today also, none appeared for the appellant. Hence,this court left with no other option except to dismiss the TaxCase Appeal for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Tax CaseAppeal is dismissed for non prosecution No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, Cuddalore. 2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'C'' Bench. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XI Chennai. GSM(CO)SB(04/08/2021) T.C.A.No.18 of 2012
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan