S.subramanian & Co v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis
High Court
27 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
S.subramanian & Co v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis
Date of order
27 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019, 2019-2020
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In S.subramanian & Co v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 27.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)Nos.5763 and 5764 of 2024
and
WMP(MD)Nos.5440, 5441,5442 and 5444 of 2024
S.Subramanian & Corepresented by its PartnerJohn Dhinakar
... Petitioner in Both WPsVs1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Income Tax Office, Ground and First Floor, Seekalai Street, Karaikudi – 630 002.2.The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaght Lane, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. ... Respondents in Both WPs
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certioraricallingfortherecordsin DIN/ITBA/ASTS/S/147/2023-2024/1059202262(1)dated 29.12.2023andDIN.ITBA/ASTS/S/147/2023-24/ 105231014(1) dated 30.12.2023 on the file of the 2[nd ]1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent relating to AY.2018-2019 and AY.2019-2020 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.BaskarFor Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel
in both WPs
ORDER
As against the order of the assessments of the years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, these writ petitions are filed.
based the judgment assessment, tax liability was
imposed on the petitioner. According to the
petitioner the e-mail Id was created by his
accountant and he is not aware of the notices issued through email. Therefore the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks one opportunity for him to submit his explanation for the escaped income.
2/5
WP(MD)No.5763 of 2024
3.The learned Standing Counsel for the
respondents submits that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy, however, he has not resorted to the same.
4.This Court considered the rival submissions made.
5.The petitioner claims that he is unaware of
the notice sent through the e-mail id, which was created by his accountant and the accountant has failed to inform him about same. Therefore on the ground of principles of natural justice, the issue is remitted back to the respondents for passing orders afresh.
6.The respondents shall open the portal allowing
the petitioner to upload the relevant details. The petitioner shall upload all the relevant details within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such uploading, the respondents shall complete the re-opened assessment within a period of two weeks therefrom.
3/5
7.These writ petitions are disposed of with the
above directions. No costs. Consequently connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
27.03.2024
To
1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Income Tax Office, Ground and First Floor, Seekalai Street, Karaikudi – 630 002.
2.The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaght Lane, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001.
4/5
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP(MD)No.5763 of 2024
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
WP(MD)Nos.5763 and 5764 of 2024
27.03.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.