Case LawHigh Court › St. Xavier’s Education Trust v. Asstt.di...

St. Xavier’s Education Trust v. Asstt.director Of I.t

High Court 04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
St. Xavier’s Education Trust v. Asstt.director Of I.t
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In St. Xavier’s Education Trust v. Asstt.director Of I.t, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.220 OF 2005 St. Xavier’s Education Trust Vs. Asstt.Director of I.T. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office MemorandaCourt’s or Judge’s orders.of Coram, appearance, Court’sorders or directions andRegistrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant. Mr.A.D.Kango for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 24th March,2008. P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken onboard.2. In view of the subsequent order passed bythe Tribunal in Misc. Application preferredby the assessee, the learned counsel seeksleave to withdraw the appeal. Appealdismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. 3. The question of law, if any, is kept open for consideration in appropriate case. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan