Case Law › High Court › Stamp Number Main v. Nutan D. Sardessai,...

Stamp Number Main v. Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj

High Court 19 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

19 Aug 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Stamp Number Main v. Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 mca674-19dt.19.8.19 Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.674 OF 2019 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2157 OF 2019 The Principal Commissioner of ….Income Tax, Panaji.Applicant. Versus Goa Dourado Promotions Pvt. Ltd. …. Respondent. Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Rama Rivankar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram : M.S. Sonak & Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ. Date : 19[th] August, 2019. P.C.:- Heard Ms. Linhares for the Applicant and Mr. RamaRivankar for the Respondent. 2. Taking into consideration the averments in the CivilApplication, the delay of 4 days in instituting the Tax Appeal is,hereby, condoned. 3. Misc. Civil Application is disposed of. 2 mca674-19dt.19.8.19 Nutan D. Sardessai, J. M.S. Sonak, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.