Case Law › High Court › Standing Counsel v. M/S. Dewan Chand Sat...

Standing Counsel v. M/S. Dewan Chand Satyapal

High Court 21 Dec 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

21 Dec 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Standing Counsel v. M/S. Dewan Chand Satyapal, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal.

Decision: The present appeals are allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA No.87/2003 titled Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 05.12.2012 PRONOUNCED ON: 21.12.2012 + ITA NO. 1411/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX …………..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. M/S. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL ………… Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA NO. 1541/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX …………..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL ………… Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA No.87/2003 titled Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Dewan Chand Satyapal. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) December 21, 2012 R.V. EASWAR (JUDGE)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.