Starmark Vinimay Pvt. Ltd v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties
High Court
11 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Starmark Vinimay Pvt. Ltd v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties
Date of order
11 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Starmark Vinimay Pvt. Ltd v. Heard Learned Advocates Appearing For The Parties, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
11.01.2024PBSl. No.16.
WPA 287 of 2024
Starmark Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. VsDeputy Commissioner of IncomeTax Central Circle 2(2), Kolkata & Ors.Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das. … For the Petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De.……for the respondent.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for theparties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has made a veryinnocuous prayer for direction upon the CIT (Appeals)concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal in question which has been filed on 29[th] April,2022 as appears from page 178 of the writ petition.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thiscase this writ petition being WPA 287 of 2024 isdisposed of by directing the respondent CIT (Appeals)concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal in question filed by the petitioner expeditiouslyand preferably within six months from the date ofcommunication of this order.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue