Case Law › High Court › Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commi...

Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissione Rof Income Tax Patiala

High Court 05 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

05 Oct 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissione Rof Income Tax Patiala, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1aINTHE PUNJABHARYANAHIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARHDateofDecisionl 05102011ITA No16of2003Mls BhagtanDi Hatti General MerchantsAppellantVersus1rCommissionerofIncome TaxPatialaanotheree0PresentMlsfor Akshay[Bhan][ c]Alok Mittal [Advocates]0theappellantMsSavita Saxena AdvocateIfor theC5ICORAMHONBLEMRJUSTICE FMANTGUPTAZHONBLEMRJUSTICE JASWANTSINGHCHEMANTGUPTAJeIFororderseeCWPN03765of1997 titledMlsSood08Bhandari4 Coe Vs Central Board ofDirect Taxes OanothervmIJZ3mHEMANTGUPTAIJUDGE05102011Vimal116Il111Gupta SuruchiJOYTI RANI2012.11.07 15: 452016.03.28 15:57True ScannedCopy Of TheI attest to the accuracy andtOriginalintegrity of this documentPHHC,Chandigarh

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.