Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, & Anr
Date of order
08 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
In Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, & Anr, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No.229 of 2014
====================================================== Deo Nandan Prasad (Huf) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
The present application has been filed for
2 08-01-2014
restoration of Cr. Misc. No. 35470 of 2011 which stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 05.12.2013.
On the grounds mentioned in the restoration application, let the Cr. Misc. No. 35470 of 2011 be restored to its original file.
Accordingly the restoration application is
allowed.
Shageer/-
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.