Case Law › High Court › Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commi...

Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Patiala

High Court 05 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

05 Oct 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Patiala, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

4IN TIPUNJAB8YANAHIGH CT lJ Date ofDecision05OlOll Mls SadhuRam Dev Dutt ITAN01120f2002 ee Appellant Versus1rCommissionerofIncome Tax Patiala ceanotherPresentlMls Akshay[Bhan c0]Alok Mittal [Advocates]0for [the]appellant0MsSavitaSaxena Advocatefor theC5CORAMHONBLENJUSTICE HEMANTGUPTAZHONBLEMR JUSTICE JASWANTSINGHrHEMANTGUPTAJeIFororderseeCWPNo765of1997 titledMlsSood5BhandariCoVs Central Board ofDirect Taxes 8i another71ZHEMANTGUPTAIJUDGE05101Oll6JASWAN7Vimal1Il1U1IfVt11Uma2012.11.03JOYTI RANI2016.03.28 15:5711: 58Scanned TrueCopy of OriginalI attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this documentPHHC,Chandigarh

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.