Case Law › High Court › Start Of Picture Text ----- v. Parek...

Start Of Picture Text ----- v. Parekh Mumbai 400 009

High Court 22 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Start Of Picture Text ----- v. Parekh Mumbai 400 009, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1916 OF 2008ININOCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1629 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-13,Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,Mumbai 400 020...Appellantv/sMr Harish V. ParekhMumbai 400 009...RespondentMs Anamika Chatterji for Appellant.Mr K.B. Bhogale for Respondent.CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE: 22ND AUGUST 2008 P.C.- delay cannot be condoned. The notice of motion istherefore disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of the Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.

Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Parekh<Br>Mumbai 400 009

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary