Startec Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit
High Court
24 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Startec Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit
Date of order
24 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Startec Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal and the application are disposed of. disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
24.09.2025
SL No.9
Court No.1
(gc)
MAT 1141 of 2025
CAN 1 of 2025
Startec Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd.
Vs.
Income-Tax Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit),
Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Ritzu Ghosal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sayantan Chatterjee, Mr. Sankalp Malik, Mr. Shikhan Sharma, Mr. Anirban Ghosh
…for the Appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Kr. Agrahari …for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3.
1.Upon the appellant furnishing a bank guarantee for a sum of Rs.1.90 crores within 13[th] October, 2025, the impugned order of confiscation shall remain stayed and the adjudicating authority shall revisit the order of confiscation and take a fresh decision after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant. In default, the confiscation proceeding may continue in accordance with law.
2.
The authority concerned shall not be influenced by its earlier observation or any observation made in this order while deciding the matter afresh.
3.
The order of confiscation shall not implement against the assets of the appellant till 13[th]October, 2025.
4.
We make it clear that the appellant is restrained from dealing with any immoveable properties or movables like security, shares of like nature till the bank guarantee for the aforesaid amount is furnished.
5.
An unconditional bank guarantee should be furnished in favour of Administrator, Income Tax Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit), Kolkata within 13[th] October, 2025.
6.
We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. merits of the matter.
7.
Accordingly, the appeal and the application are disposed of. disposed of.
8.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
9.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
[Soumen Sen, C.J. (Acting)]
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.