State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur, Head Office Tilak Marg C-Scheme Through Magan Singh Rathore v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur, Ncr Building Statuecircle Jaipur-2Circle Jaipur-2
High Court
03 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur, Head Office Tilak Marg C-Scheme Through Magan Singh Rathore v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur, Ncr Building Statuecircle Jaipur-2Circle Jaipur-2
Date of order
03 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur, Head Office Tilak Marg C-Scheme Through Magan Singh Rathore v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur, Ncr Building Statuecircle Jaipur-2Circle Jaipur-2, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 5 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Misc. Application No.1203/2018
IN
D.B. Misc. Review Petition No. 65/2018
IN
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.172/2008
State Bank of Bikaner And Jaipur, Head Office Tilak Marg C-Scheme Through Magan Singh Rathore S/o Shri Dharam SinghRathore Chief Manager (Taxation) Of The Bank
----Appellant-Non-Applicant
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax Jaipur, NCR Building StatueCircle Jaipur-2Circle Jaipur-2
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, SR-I Jaipur----Respondents-Review Applicants----Respondents-Review Applicants
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak for review applicant (Income Tax Department)applicant (Income Tax Department)For Respondent(s): Mr. Prakhul Khurana for review non-applicant (SBBJ Bank)applicant (SBBJ Bank)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
03/04/2025
Order
Heard on the application under Sections 5 of the Limitation
Act for condonation of delay in filing the review petition.For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed. The delay in filing the review petition is condoned.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Garima/32 (2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue