State Bank Of Patiala v. Commissioner Of Incometax[(2016) 383 Itr 244 (Sc)] Which Is Extracted Herein
High Court
12 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
State Bank Of Patiala v. Commissioner Of Incometax[(2016) 383 Itr 244 (Sc)] Which Is Extracted Herein
Date of order
12 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In State Bank Of Patiala v. Commissioner Of Incometax[(2016) 383 Itr 244 (Sc)] Which Is Extracted Herein, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: ITA No.731/2009 The appeal would stand rejected answering thequestions raised in favour of the assessee and againstthe revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
MONDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1940
ITA.No. 731 of 2009
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN TA 12/2000 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 03-02-2006
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORETHIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.J.ANILKUMARSMT G.MINI(1748)SRI.A.KUMARSRI.P.S.SREE PRASAD
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA No.731/2009
JUDGMENT
The issue raised in the appeal is as towhether interest payable on default amounts due underdiscounted bills of exchange would be chargeable underInterest Act, 1974 or not.
2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court is held so in
-State Bank of Patiala v. Commissioner of IncomeTax[(2016) 383 ITR 244 (SC)] which is extracted herein:
"The Interest Act, unlike the Income-Tax Act,1961 focuses only on a very narrow taxable eventwhich does not include within its ken interestpayable on default in payment of amounts dueunder a discounted bill of exchange"
3. The issue raised herein are with respect to
interest on refinance and interest on overdue bills.Both of which would stand covered under the aforesaiddeclaration as extracted above.
ITA No.731/2009
The appeal would stand rejected answering thequestions raised in favour of the assessee and againstthe revenue. There is no order as to costs.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/-ASHOK MENONJUDGE
ITA No.731/2009
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSINGOFFICER DATED 22.11.1999ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) DATED 09.03.2000
ANNEXURE C
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 03.02.2006
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.