Case LawHigh Court › State Of Rajasthan Through Sub Registrar...

State Of Rajasthan Through Sub Registrar, Renwal, Distt. Jaipur,Rajasthan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cib, Room

High Court 06 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
State Of Rajasthan Through Sub Registrar, Renwal, Distt. Jaipur,Rajasthan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cib, Room
Date of order
06 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In State Of Rajasthan Through Sub Registrar, Renwal, Distt. Jaipur,Rajasthan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cib, Room, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 246A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.The writ petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5403/2011 State Of Rajasthan Through Sub Registrar, Renwal, Distt. Jaipur,Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cib, Room No. 344,Na, Central Building Statue Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Kartikeya Sharma forMr.Sandeep Taneja, AAGMr.Sandeep Taneja, AAGFor Respondent(s): Mr.N.S.Bhati forMr.Anuroop SinghiMr.Anuroop Singhi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA 06/03/2025 Order 1.The limited issue in the present petition is with regard tomaintainability of appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) for short (‘CIT (A)’) against the penalty order passedunder Section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘theAct’). The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed by theCIT(A) being not maintainable. 2.From plain reading of the language of Section 246A (1)(q),the penalty orders passed under Chapter XXI of the Act areappellable before the CIT(A). The penalty order under Section271FA of the Act falls within Chapter 21. 3.This Court in SBCWP No.11458/2011 (Director of Income Tax (CIB) Vs. Ravi Vijay & Another) dated09.07.2012 has taken the similar view. 4.The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the CIT(A), Jaipur to decide the appeal in accordance with law. 5.The writ petition is allowed. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/71
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan