Stci Finance Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax1(3)(1), Mumbai
High Court
23 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Stci Finance Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax1(3)(1), Mumbai
Date of order
23 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Stci Finance Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax1(3)(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Dusane
1/2101,102,nma761,762
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.761 OF 2017ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.326 OF 2017
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.762 OF 2017IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.325 OF 2017
STCI Finance Ltd.....Applicant
In the matter between
STCI Finance Ltd.....Appellant
Vs.
Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax1(3)(1), Mumbai.
....Respondent
Ms. Arati Vissanji for the Applicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017
Dusane
101,102,nma761,762
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Respondent has been served and the acknowledgment to that effect is filed.
2For the reasons stated in the affidavits supporting the Notice of Motions, the Motions are allowed. Delay caused in filing the appeals is condoned. Motions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.