Case Law › High Court › Steel Plant Private Limited v. Assistant...

Steel Plant Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle -2(4

High Court 01 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Steel Plant Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle -2(4, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.826 OF 2002WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 827 OF 2002 Steel Plant Private Limited: Appellant v/s Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle -2(4): Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani for AppellantMr. Parag Vyas i/b Mr. J.S. Saluja forrespondent Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan S.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 1.9.2008 P.C. .Heard the learned counsel for the appellant withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded to the appellant as per rule. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.