Case LawHigh Court › Sts v. Chitambaresh, J

Sts v. Chitambaresh, J

High Court 24 Apr 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Sts v. Chitambaresh, J
Date of order
24 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sts v. Chitambaresh, J, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/4TH VAISAKHA 1934WP(C).No. 10230 of 2012 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SMT. MANJU AJITHKUMAR, ''SUMTHRUPTHI'',RAJADHANI BUILDINGS, EAST FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN SMT.RAJI VINCENT RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-III, ERNAKULAM-682 018. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX(APPEALS)-III, ERNAKULAM-682 018. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), 5TH FLOOR, KANDAMKULATHIL TOWERS,M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-682 011 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-04-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)NO.10230/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT-P1 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT (AY:2004-05) EXT-P2 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT(AY:2005-06)EXT-P3 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT (AY:2006-07)EXT-P4 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT (AY:2007-08)EXT-P5 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT(AY:2008-09)EXT-P6 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT(AY:2009-10_EXT-P7 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT(AY:2010-11)EXT-P8 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT(AY:2004-05)EXT-P9 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FOR STAYEXT-P10 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FOR STAY EXT-P11 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT-P12 TRUE COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE V. CHITAMBARESH, J. = === = = = = = = = = == = = == = == = = W.P.C. NO. 10230 OF 2012 = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24[th] day of April 2012 JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred statutory appeals againstthe orders of assessment. Exts.P3 to P8 are the memorandumof appeals pending with the appellate authority. Exts.P9 andP10 are the applications for stay also pending consideration. 2. The first respondent is directed to consider Exts.P9 andP10 with notice to the petitioner within one month from thedate of production of a copy of this judgment. The recoveryproceedings initiated against the petitioner would remainstayed till orders are passed on Exts.P9 and P10 as directedabove. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- V. CHITAMBARESHJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan