Case LawHigh Court › Subh Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Co...

Subh Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8)1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 24 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Subh Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8)1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
24 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Subh Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8)1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

24.06.2022. p.b.Sl. No.17. W.P.A. 11183 of 2022 Subh Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd. Vs.Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax, Circle-8)1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Sk. Md. Bilwal Hossain,Mr. Binayak Gupta. ……..for the petitioner. Mr. Om Narayan Rai. ……..for the UOI. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned assessment order dated 4[th] February, 2022under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating tothe assessment year 2015-16 mainly on two grounds,namely that the petitioner’s objection to the recordedreason was rejected by passing a non-speaking order andwithout dealing with the contentions raised in its objectionto the recorded reason and secondly that before passingthe impugned assessment order, the assessing officer hadissued a notice dated 3[rd] February, 2022 under Section142(1) of the Act by which petitioner was asked to furnishrelevant documents on or before 10[th] February, 2022 andwithout waiting for the response by the petitioner againstthe aforesaid notice dated 3[rd] February, 2022 by whichtime was granted by the assessing officer himself to the petitioner, the assessing officer on 4[th] February, 2022passed the impugned assessment order which is inviolation of the principle of natural justice. Considering the submission of the parties, this writpetition being WPA No.11183 of 2022 is disposed of bysetting aside the impugned assessment order dated 4[th]February, 2022 and the matter is remanded back to theassessing officer concerned to pass fresh speaking orderon the objection to the recorded reason by dealing with thecontentions raised by the petitioner in its objection andfurther considering the response to the notice underSection 142(1) of the Act which is to be filed by thepetitioner within seven days from date. Needless tomention that before passing the fresh assessment order,the opportunity of hearing should be provided to thepetitioner. With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA No.11183 of 2022 is disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan