Case Law › High Court › Subhash Rajaram Potdar v. Commissioner O...

Subhash Rajaram Potdar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nashik And Another

High Court 02 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Feb 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Subhash Rajaram Potdar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nashik And Another, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11089 OF 2014 IN ITAST/29824/2014 WITH CA/11090/2014 IN ITAST/29824/2014 SUBHASH RAJARAM POTDAR VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NASHIK AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chandak Raviraj R. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Alok Sharma ..... CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 2[nd] FEBRUARY, 2015 P.C. :- 1.Heard. 2.For the reasons mentioned in the civil application, the same is allowed. Delay condoned. Civil application stands disposed of. ( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( A. V. NIRGUDE, J. ) rlj/

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.