Sudalai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cr Bldg
High Court
21 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Sudalai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cr Bldg
Date of order
21 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2017-2018
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sudalai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cr Bldg, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Therefore, the petitioner prays that the impugned order be set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
andW.M.P.(MD)Nos.5882 and 5883 of 2025
Sudalai
-vs-
... Petitioner
1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, CR BLDG 2, VP Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Visvanathapuram, Madurai - 625002.
2.Income Tax Officer,
Office of the Income Tax Officer,
Ward - 4, Tirunelveli.
... Respondents
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the respondent and quash the impugned assessment order passed by first respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act 1961 in PANFWHPS4607D,dated15.01.2025inDIN ITBA/AST/S/147/2024-2025/1072198728(1) for the AY 2017-18, within the period stipulated by this Court.
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the
first respondent, dated 15.01.2025, for the Assessment Year 2017-2018.
2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, alleging unexplained expenditure, cash deposits and withdrawals by the petitioner, the first respondent has passed the impugned order for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, dated 15.01.2025, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, which is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the petitioner prays that the impugned order be set aside.
4. Mr.J.Parekh Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the
____________
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Instead of invoking the said appeal remedy, the petitioner has directly approached this Court.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and raise all the grounds raised in this writ petition in the appeal. In the event, if any appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without reference to the period of limitation and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of three months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
NCC : Yes / No 21.03.2025Index : Yes / No smn2
____________
To:-
1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, CR BLDG 2, VP Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Visvanathapuram, Madurai - 625002. CR BLDG 2, VP Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Visvanathapuram, Madurai - 625002.
2.The Income Tax Officer,
Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4, Tirunelveli. Ward - 4, Tirunelveli.
____________
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
____________
Page 5 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
smn2
W.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2025
21.03.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.