Case Law › High Court › Sudhakar v. Damle

Sudhakar v. Damle

High Court 27 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Sudhakar v. Damle

Date of order

27 Mar 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sudhakar v. Damle, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition is accordingly disposed of. [RANJIT MORE, J.]

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 16 OF 2012 Sudhakar V. Damle. VersusThe Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Petitioner. ..Respondents. Ms. Jone Cox for the petitioner. Mr. N.R.Prajapati for R-1.Ms. Amruta Buhal i/b Consulta Juris for R-2. Coram : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & RANJIT MORE, J.Date :March 27, 2012. P. C. : 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner, who is present before the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for is granted. Petition is accordingly disposed of. [RANJIT MORE, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.