Case Law › High Court › Sudhir v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Sudhir v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Nagpur

High Court 26 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Sudhir v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Nagpur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2359/2003 Sudhir s/o Ramswaroop Mundra and others...Versus...The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Nagpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Adv. with Shri S.N. Tapadia, Adv. for petitionersShri Anand Parchure, Advocate for respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE: 26.02.2016 By this petition, the petitioners have challenged theimpugned order transferring the assessment case of thepetitioners from Nagpur to Jodhpur as being arbitrary andunconstitutional. It appears on a reading of the PursisSt. No.8233/2004 that during the pendency of the writ petition,the impugned order dated 25.4.2003 was withdrawn by therespondent and fresh order was passed on 28.1.2004, which isunder challenge in Writ Petition No.1455/2004. In view of the statement made in the Pursis, the causefor filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The writpetition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule standsdischarged. JUDGEJUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.