Sujit Kumar Roy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) 6, Kolkata &Ors
High Court
27 Sep 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Sujit Kumar Roy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) 6, Kolkata &Ors
Date of order
27 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sujit Kumar Roy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) 6, Kolkata &Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
27.9.2022 ks sl. 17
ks WPA 20623 of 2022
Sujit Kumar Roy
Vs
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) 6, Kolkata &Ors.
Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya,
Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Aryak Dutt
… For the UOI.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. This is the second round of litigation initiated bythe petitioner. Petitioner had filed a writ petition onearlier occasion being WPA 14383 of 2022, which wasdisposed of by an order dated 13[th] July, 2022 by whichthe respondent, Income Tax Authority concerned wasdirected to consider and dispose of the representationof the petitioner dated 20[th] May, 2022 by passing areasoned and speaking order after giving anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Now thepetitioner has filed this second writ petitionchallenging the order passed by the respondent,Income Tax Authority concerned on 17[th] August, 2022pursuant to the earlier order of this Court dated 13[th]July, 2022 and considering the said order and onperusal of the contents of the aforesaid impugnedorder, I am not inclined to interfere with the same and,
accordingly this writ petition being WPA 20623 of 2022is dismissed.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.