Sulekha Vijendra Shenai v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle Ii, Mumbai & Ors
High Court
05 Mar 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sulekha Vijendra Shenai v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle Ii, Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
05 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sulekha Vijendra Shenai v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle Ii, Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. [ MILIND N.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
R.M. AMBERKAR(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 2001
Sulekha Vijendra Shenai
..Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle II, Mumbai & Ors...Respondents
...................
None present for the parties. None present for the parties.
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 5, 2020.
P.C.:
1.None appears for the petitioner on call. On the last
occasion i.e on 30.1.2020, the following order was passed:-
"1.None appears for the petitioner on call.
2.Stand over to 20.02.2020; to be listed under the caption "fordismissal".dismissal".
2.Since there is no representation on behalf of the
petitioner, Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2020.03.0611:18:49+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.