Suman Bhagat v. Income Tax Officer Ward 33(2
High Court
20 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Suman Bhagat v. Income Tax Officer Ward 33(2
Date of order
20 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Suman Bhagat v. Income Tax Officer Ward 33(2, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is, therefore, disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P. (C) No. 5680/2017
SUMAN BHAGAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Aswani, Advocate.
..... Petitioner
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 33(2)
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R% 20.09.2017
1. The learned counsel for the Respondent has produced a copy of the letter dated 19[th] September 2017 addressed to the counsel for the Revenue by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 33(1) stating that the refund amounts have been sanctioned. She assures that the said amounts will be reflected in the Petitioner’s account not later than one week from today.
2. In that view of the matter, no further directions are called for in this petition. The petition is, therefore, disposed of.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 ‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue