Case Law › High Court › Sumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd v. Comm...

Sumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai

High Court 23 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Jun 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Dusane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.790 OF 2017IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.796 OF 2017 Sumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd.....ApplicantIn the matter betweenSumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd.....Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai....Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Applicant.None for the Respondent. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017 PER COURT : Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. 2For the reasons stated in the affidavit supporting the Notice of Motion, the Motion is allowed. Delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Motion is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 2/2 3The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, states that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal. In view of that, the Appeal is disposed off as withdrawn. No costs. 4Court fees be refunded as per rule. ( G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.