Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Ltd v. Dy.cit Spl.rg-3
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Ltd v. Dy.cit Spl.rg-3
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Ltd v. Dy.cit Spl.rg-3, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1193 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.306 OF 2004
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Ltd..Appellant
Versus
Dy.CIT Spl.RG-3 ..Respondents
----
Mr.Nilesh Joshi & Rajesh Poojari i/by Mulla & Mulla
for the appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 9 days. Considering the
cause shown delay condoned subject to the appellant
paying respondent cost quantified at Rs.2500/-
within six weeks from today. Motion disposed off
accordingly.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue