In Sumpoorna Portfolio Limitedthrough: Mr. Sandeep Sapra, Adv v. Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-8 & Ors, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~27
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(C) 11999/2016
SUMPOORNA PORTFOLIO LIMITEDThrough: Mr. Sandeep Sapra, Adv.
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-8 & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. P. Roychaudhuri and Ms. VibhootiMalhotra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRIO R D E R%10.01.2017
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that claimfor direction to lift the freezing of bank account has been renderedinfructuous since the account is now operable.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
JANUARY 10, 2017/kk
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.