Case Law › High Court › Sunder System Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commiss...

Sunder System Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 29 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

29 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sunder System Pvt. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1733/2016 SUNDER SYSTEM PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi with Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-17 & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok. K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, jr. Standing counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 29.02.2016 CM APPL 7431/2016 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. WP (C) 1733/2016 & CM APPL 7430/2016 (for stay) 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a freshly constituted petition in accordance with law. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The pending application also stands dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J FEBRUARY 29, 2016/Rk VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.