Sunil Kumar v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16645 of 2019 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar S/o Sri Bhuvneshwar Sharma Mohalla- Birla Colony, NagwaHouse, P.o. and P.s.- Phulwari Sharif Town, Distt.- Patna-801505 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The Union of India through the Chief Commissioner, Income TaxDepartment, Revenue Building, Veerchand Patel Marg, PatnaDepartment, Revenue Building, Veerchand Patel Marg, Patna 2.The Chief Commissioner Income Tax Department, Revenue Building,Veerchand Patel Marg, Patna-800001Veerchand Patel Marg, Patna-800001 3.The Joint Commissioner Income Tax Department, Range-I, LokmanyBhawan, Dak Bungalow Crossing, Fraser Road, Patna-1Bhawan, Dak Bungalow Crossing, Fraser Road, Patna-1 4.The Income Tax Commissioner Ward 1(2), Lokmany Bhawan, DakBungalow Crossing, Fraser Road, Patna-1Bungalow Crossing, Fraser Road, Patna-1 ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s:For the Respondent/s: Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMARORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) Date : 25-11-2020Heard the parties. Heard the parties. Petitioner has prayed for following relief:- “This is an application is for issuance of writ ofMandamus commanding the respondent to refund theexcess tax deducted by the respondents amount of thepetitioner for assessment year 2012-13 to 2017-18, totalthereof is Rs.91,880/- with interest @ 12% and 25,000/-as litigation cost or direction/directions or order/ orderswhich may be found just and proper.”excess tax deducted by the respondents amount of thepetitioner for assessment year 2012-13 to 2017-18, totalthereof is Rs.91,880/- with interest @ 12% and 25,000/-as litigation cost or direction/directions or order/ orderswhich may be found just and proper.” It has been submitted by Mrs. Archana Sinha, learned counsel for the Department of Income Tax, that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and the refund has alreadybeen credited into his account of the relevant years, as such,present petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly,dismissed. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- AFR/NAFRNAFRCAV DATENAUploading Date28.11.2020Transmission DateNA