Sunil Ratnani v. State Of Rajasthan

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4537/2024 Sunil Ratnani S/o Surya Prakash Ratnani, Aged About 51 Years,79, Income Tax Colony, Paota C Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional ChiefSecretary, Water Resources Department, Government OfRajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government OfRajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Assistant Secretary, Water Resources Department,Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Chief Engineer (Headquarter), Water ResourcesDepartment, Jaipur.Department, Jaipur. 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department,Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Water ResourcesDepartment, Jodhpur Circle, Jodhpur.Department, Jodhpur Circle, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, DySG assistedby Mr. Uttam Singh Rajpurohitby Mr. Uttam Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s): Mr. Manish Patel, AAG assisted by Ms.Mehali MehtaMehali Mehta JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 02/05/2024 1.Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, learned Deputy Solicitor Generalassisted by Mr. Uttam Singh Rajpurohit, submitted that in thechanged circumstances, his client proposes to file application forrevocation of suspension under Clause (5) of Rule (13) ofRajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules,1958, instead of arguing the petition on merits. 2.He further submitted that petitioner would be satisfied if adirection is issued to the competent authority of the respondentsto take decision as early as possible. 3.In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dispose of with adirection to the petitioner to file a representation under Clause (5)of Rule (13) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control andAppeal) Rules, 1958 from today. 4.In case, a representation is so addressed, the competentauthority of the respondents shall decide the same (regardingrevocation of suspension of petitioner) in accordance with lawpreferably within two months. 5.Stay application also stands disposed of. 549-raksha/- (DINESH MEHTA),J