Sunil T. Doshi v. The Additional Commissioner Of
High Court
23 Jun 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sunil T. Doshi v. The Additional Commissioner Of
Date of order
23 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sunil T. Doshi v. The Additional Commissioner Of, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.45 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1556 OF 2016
Sunil T. Doshi....ApplicantMumbaiIn the matter betweenSunil T. Doshi....AppellantMumbaiVs.The Additional Commissioner of....RespondentIncome-Tax 24(2), Mumbai
Mr. P.V. Irani a/w Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Applicant.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 23 JUNE, 2017
PER COURT :
This present Motion is moved for condonation of delay of 549 days in filing the appeal. Learned counsel submits that the
Dusane
Respondent has been served and affidavit of service has been filed on record. None appears for the Respondent.
2For the reasons stated in the affidavit supporting the Notice of Motion, the Motion is allowed. Delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Motion is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue