Case LawHigh Court › Sunil v. Sangoi, Mumbai

Sunil v. Sangoi, Mumbai

High Court 19 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sunil v. Sangoi, Mumbai
Date of order
19 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sunil v. Sangoi, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1069 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 371 OF 2011 Sunil V. Sangoi, Mumbai...Appellant. Vs.Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax.Central Circle 33, Mumbai & Anr...Respondents. Mr. Subhash Shete with Mandar Vaidya for the Appellant.Ms. Padma Divakar for Respondents. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. 1.Heard by consent. 2.By consent, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan