Sunil v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Sunil v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sunil v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sunil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA TAX No.25 of 1996 DR.K.K.MISHRA Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-----------
For the petitioner : Mr. D.V.Pathay, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad,
Senior standing counsel Ms. Archana Sinha, Advocate
-------
P R E S E N T
Hon'ble the Chief Justice &
Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.K. Prasad
-------
Dated, the Ist September, 2008
Counsel for the assessee submits, and, in our view fairly,
that in view of our order passed today in Tax Case No.24 of 1996,
Doctor. Smt. Rangila Sinha V. The Commissioner of Income Tax, fate of this tax case is sealed.
2. In what we observed in the case of Dr. (Smt.) Rangila
Sinha today, it has to be held and, we do hold, that the tax case does
not give rise to any question of law and, therefore, there is no
justification in calling for reference from the Tribunal. The findings
recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna,
are concluded on facts.
3. Tax case is disposed of, accordingly.
R.M. Lodha, CJ
C.K. Prasad, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.