Case Law › High Court › Sunita Jain v. Rajendra Dhariwal

Sunita Jain v. Rajendra Dhariwal

High Court 22 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

22 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sunita Jain v. Rajendra Dhariwal, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty, as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1469/2020 1. Vimal Chand Dakaliya S/o Prakash Chand Dakaliya, AgedAbout 47 Years, Jodhpur.About 47 Years, Jodhpur. 2. Sunita Jain W/o Vimal Chand Dakaliya, Aged About 46Years, Both R/o Plot No.7, Jalam Vilas, Paota B Road,Jodhpur.Years, Both R/o Plot No.7, Jalam Vilas, Paota B Road,Jodhpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Local SelfDepartment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.2. MunicipalCorporationJodhpur,ThroughTheCommissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur.Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur. 3. Rajendra Dhariwal S/o Jatan Raj Dhariwal, 61, IncomeTax Colony, Paota C Road, Jodhpur.Tax Colony, Paota C Road, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh A. Purohit : Ms. Aruna Negi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH 22/09/2021 Order Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writpetition with liberty to file afresh, if need so arises. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty, as prayed. 79-Ashutosh/- (INDERJEET SINGH),J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.