In Sunitaben Champaklal Patel v. Income Tax Officer Ward - 2 (3)(4, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/SCA/16789/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16789 of 2018
==========================================================SUNITABEN CHAMPAKLAL PATELVersus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 (3)(4)
==========================================================
Appearance:MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH TRIVEDI
Date : 29/10/2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition keeping the challenge to the validity of Notice of re-opening of assessment open to be raised before the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment proceedings. Permission as prayed for is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
PRAVIN KARUNAN
(UMESH TRIVEDI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.