Sunny Gems India Pvt. Ltd., (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
High Court
25 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sunny Gems India Pvt. Ltd., (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
25 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sunny Gems India Pvt. Ltd., (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5622/2022
Sunny Gems India Pvt. Ltd., (Ay 2013-14), Having Its RegisteredOffice At 32, Shopping Centre, Janata Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan -302004, Through Mr. Radha Mohan Vijay, Its Authorized Person.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4, N.c.r.Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302005.Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302005.
2. Union Of India, Though Its Secretary, Central Board OfDirect Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (Nct)-110001.Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (Nct)-110001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Agarwal Advocate. For Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate.For Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
25/04/2022
Mr. Anuroop Singh, learned counsel enters appearance onbehalf of the respondents.
Advance copy of the petition has been supplied to learnedcounsel for the respondents.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, oninstructions, would submit that till date, final assessment orderhas not been passed by the Assessing Authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it hasbeen put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decisionrendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer,
Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batchof petitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid andimpermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, forthe reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in theaforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition isallowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Sanjay Kumawat-8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.