Supreme Court In Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Central Excise (2009
High Court
04 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Supreme Court In Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Central Excise (2009
Date of order
04 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Supreme Court In Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Central Excise (2009, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2728 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.631 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3..Appellant.Vs.Bombay Presidency Radio Club Ltd...Respondent.
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
...
CORAM:DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
4th January, 2010.
P.C.:
The Notice of Motion seeks condonation of delay in filing the appeal. On
20th July, 2009 the appeal was dismissed by the Division Bench on the ground that though the appeal was barred by limitation, no Motion for condonation has been taken out. But apart from this, the Division Bench observed that in view of the decision of the
Supreme Court in Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise (2009
(238) ELT 705 (SC)), this Court had held in CIT v. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of
Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (Lodg.) N.3592 of 2008 decided on 8th July, 2009) that
this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 260A of
the Income Tax Act, 1961. In view of the fact that the appeal has already been dismissed
on 20th July, 2009 both on the ground that at that stage no Motion had been taken out and
that this Court has no power to condone the delay under Section 260A, this Motion shall
have to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.