Case LawHigh Court › Surana Mutha Developers.. Org v. The Inc...

Surana Mutha Developers.. Org v. The Income Tax Officer, 11(4), Pune

High Court 11 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Surana Mutha Developers.. Org v. The Income Tax Officer, 11(4), Pune
Date of order
11 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Surana Mutha Developers.. Org v. The Income Tax Officer, 11(4), Pune, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1007 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2868 OF 2018 Surana Mutha Developers.. Applicant In the Matter Between:- Surana Mutha Developers.. Org. Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, 11(4), Pune .. Respondent ................... Mr. Rohan Deshpande i/by Alisha Pinto for the Applicant / Org.AppellantMr. Rohan Deshpande i/by Alisha Pinto for the Applicant / Org.Appellant ................... CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. P.C.: DATE : JANUARY 11, 2019. 1.This Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay of 16 day in filing an Appeal from the order dated12.3.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2.We have perused the afÏdavit in support of the Motionand we are satisfied with the reasons recorded therein forthe delay in filing the appeal. 3.Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan