Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi & Anr
High Court
01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Surendra Kumar Jain v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~22 to 34
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 01.10.2018
+
W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & CM APPL.16760/2018
SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
23
+ W.P.(C) 4306/2018 & CM APPL.16761/2018
SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
24
+ W.P.(C) 4307/2018 & CM APPL.16762/2018SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
25
+ W.P.(C) 4308/2018 & CM APPL.16763/2018
SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
26
+ W.P.(C) 4309/2018 & CM APPL.16764/2018
SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
27
+
W.P.(C) 4310/2018 & CM APPL.16766/2018
W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 3
SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
28 + W.P.(C) 4311/2018 & CM APPL.16768/2018VIRENDRA JAIN versus
..... Petitioner
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
..... Respondents ..... Petitioner
29 + W.P.(C) 4313/2018 & CM APPL.16772/2018
VIRENDRA JAIN
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents 30 + W.P.(C) 4314/2018 & CM APPL.16774/2018VIRENDRA JAIN ..... Petitioner versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
..... Respondents ..... Petitioner
31 + W.P.(C) 4315/2018 & CM APPL.16781/2018VIRENDRA JAIN
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents 32 + W.P.(C) 4316/2018 & CM APPL.16782/2018VIRENDRA JAIN ..... Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of 3
33
+ W.P.(C) 4318/2018 & CM APPL.16786/2018VIRENDRA JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
34
+ W.P.(C) 4319/2018 & CM APPL.16787/2018
VIRENDRA JAIN
..... Petitioner
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Present: Mr.Piyush Kaushik, Adv. for petitioners, in Item Nos.22 to 34.
Mr.Ajit Sharma and Mr.Asheesh Jain, Adv. for respondents in Item Nos.22 to 34.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL)
1. WP(C) 4305/2018, WP(C) 4306/2018, WP(C) 4307/2018, WP(C) 4308/2018, WP(C) 4309/2018, WP(C) 4310/2018, WP(C) 4311/2018, WP(C) 4312/2018, WP(C) 4313/2018, WP(C) 4314/2018, WP(C) 4315/2018, WP(C) 4316/2018, WP(C) 4318/2018 and WP(C) 4319/2018 are allowed.
2. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 01.10.2018 in WP(C) 4304/2018 may be referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A.K.CHAWLA
OCTOBER 01, 2018/ssc
W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & connected matters Page 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.