Surendra Pal Singh Sahni v. Union Of India
High Court
04 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Surendra Pal Singh Sahni v. Union Of India
Date of order
04 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Surendra Pal Singh Sahni v. Union Of India, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14465/2023
Surendra Pal Singh Sahni S/o Late Rajendra Singh, Aged About65 Years, Resident Of Ruber Factory Road, Rajendra Vila, KotaJunction, Kota (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Principal Commissioner OfIncome Tax, Central Circle, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur (Rajasthan)Income Tax, Central Circle, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Commissioner Of Appeals-2, Udaipur.
3. The JCIT, Central Range Udaipur.
4. The ACIT, Central Circle, Kota.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Suresh Kumar Sahni AdvocateFor Respondents : Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate withFor Respondents : Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate with
: Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate with
No.1,3 & 4
Mr. Sarvesh Jain Advocate &
Mr. Meyhul Mittal Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMAOrder
04/09/2025
1.After petition was heard for some time, counsel for petitionerstates that he will apply to the department for refund of taxamount paid.
2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
3.Mr. Siddharth Bapna’s statement that if application for refund
is made, it will be considered in accordance with law, is accepted.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
(K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ
SANJAY KUMAWAT-Sourav/17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.