Suresh Kumar Dhaddha v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
High Court
07 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Suresh Kumar Dhaddha v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
Date of order
07 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Suresh Kumar Dhaddha v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6984/2025
Suresh Kumar Dhaddha S/o Ghyan Chand Dhaddha, Aged About60 Years, R/o F-142, Azad Marg C-Scheme, Jaipur, 302001,Rajasthan, India.
----Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, NewCentral Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Statue Circle,Jaipur, 302005
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Mahendra Gargieya withMr. Tarak AhujaMr. Tarak Ahuja
: Mr. Siddharth Bapna withMr. Sarvesh Jain &Mr. Meyhul MittalMr. Sarvesh Jain &Mr. Meyhul Mittal
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
07/05/2025
Order
1.Though number of grounds have been urged but none ofthem relate to order being wholly without jurisdiction, violation ofprinciples and mala fide, therefore, we are not inclined to interferewith the order and leave the appellant to work out his alternativeremedy by filing an appeal and raise all grounds including thegrounds raised in this petition.
2.The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
NAVAL Gandhi/Gaurav/38
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue