Sureshchandra N. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -16 & Ors
High Court
18 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sureshchandra N. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -16 & Ors
Date of order
18 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sureshchandra N. Shah v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -16 & Ors, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1186 OF 2011
Sureshchandra N. Shah.. Petitioner
Vs
Commissioner of Income Tax -16 & Ors
.. Respondents
Mr. S.C. Tiwari a/w Mr. R. Asokan a/w Natasha Mangat for the Petitioner
Mr. R. Ashokan for the Respondents
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 18th JULY, 2011.
1. This petition is filed to challenge the attachment order dated 25th August 2009 under Rule 48 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is the case of the petitioner that the flat in question which is attached pursuant to the notice dated 25th August 2009 belongs to him and not to the tax defaulter (wife) and that no amount is due and payable by him to his wife. 25th August 2009 under Rule 48 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is the case of the petitioner that the flat in question which is attached pursuant to the notice dated 25th August 2009 belongs to him and not to the tax defaulter (wife) and that no amount is due and payable by him to his wife.
2. As per Section 226(3)(vi), the proper remedy in such a case is to make a statement on oath before the Assessing Officer by raising all contentions which are raised in the present petition. to make a statement on oath before the Assessing Officer by raising all contentions which are raised in the present petition.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file an application on oath before the Assessing Officer within two weeks from today. If such an application is made, the Assessing Officer shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order according to the law.
3. The Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.costs.
[ A.A. SAYED, J ]
[ J.P. DEVADHAR, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.