In Surinder Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors..zaresspondents, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARHxKxKKK KK
CWP No. 4404 of 2016 (O&M)Date of decision: 17.03.2016
Surinder Singh
Petitioner
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors..zAReSspondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL|HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RA) RAHUL GARG
Present : Mr. Jitender Kaushik, Advocate
for the petitioner.
SK OK
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
1.Petitioner has approached this Court under Articles226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the natureof mandamus for directions to respondent No. 1 to decide hisappeal No. 10653 dated 28.04.2014 and to stay the recovery ofamount of income tax assessed during the pendency of the
appeal.
? After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw thepresent writ petition with liberty to avail alternate remedyseeking interim protection from the authorities concerned.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn. However, it shall be open tothe petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may beavailable to him, in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
17.03.2016
Wa SCC
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue