Surjit Singh Amrik Singh Saini v. Abhay Ahuja, J
High Court
25 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Surjit Singh Amrik Singh Saini v. Abhay Ahuja, J
Date of order
25 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Surjit Singh Amrik Singh Saini v. Abhay Ahuja, J, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: We, however, direct theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to consider and dispose of theappeal of the Petitioner herein, pending before it, as expeditiously aspossible.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8151 OF 2022
Surjit Singh Amrik Singh Saini
…Petitioner
Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circile-27(3), Mumbai And Others …Respondents
***
Ms. Asifa Khan for the Petitioner.Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondents.
***
CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
P. C. :
DATE : 25 JULY 2022
. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner admits that before filing of thepresent Petition, the Petitioner has filed an appeal, which is pendingadjudication before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). In thatview of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the present Petition.Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of. We, however, direct theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to consider and dispose of theappeal of the Petitioner herein, pending before it, as expeditiously aspossible.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
RAJESHDigitally signed byRAJESH VASANTVASANTCHITTEWANCHITTEWANDate: 2022.07.2712:49:29 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue