Susai Amalanathan Antoni Vincent v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Susai Amalanathan Antoni Vincent v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Susai Amalanathan Antoni Vincent v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
W.P.Nos.21529, 22590, 22621, 22701, 22761, 22853, 22882, 22889, 32168 of 2022; 16576, 21332, 21335 of 2024;16874, 19336 of 2025; & 17458 of 2023
W.P.No.21529 of 2022:
Susai Amalanathan Antoni Vincent
.. Petitioner
vs
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Office of the Income Tax Officer, Kothandapani Senguttuvan, Ward 1, Cuddalore.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax,
Pudhucherry
DP Thottam, Behind Ananda Inn, Muthialpet, Pudhuchery.
.. Respondents
__________
Page 1 of 4
Appearances:
__________
Page 2 of 4
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
In the order dated 24.06.2025 passed in the above petitions, the following paragraphs shall be inserted before paragraph 7 and paragraphs renumbered:
“7. Keeping open all rights and contentions of parties, including liberty to apply to this Court in case the Revenue succeeds before the Apex Court for revival of these petitions, the notices issued in these petitions are quashed and set aside.
8. In these petitions, apart from the issue of notices issued by JAO instead of FAO, all or many of the issues which were considered in Hexaware Technologies Ltd (supra) are involved.
9. To the extent the issues raised in Hexaware Technologies Ltd (supra) are not covered, those are kept open to be raised at the appropriate stage.
2. Paragraph 7 of the order dated 24.06.2025 shall be replaced with:
__________
Page 3 of 4
W.P.Nos.21529 of 2022 etc. batch
“With the liberty as noted above, petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, all interim applications are closed.”
3. Rest of the order remain unaltered. Original order to be corrected.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 03.07.2025
kpl
__________
Page 4 of 4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.