Susham Singla v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
High Court
23 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Susham Singla v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
Date of order
23 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Susham Singla v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: VAZIFDAR ) CHIEF JUSTICE December 23, 2016 monika ( DEEPAK SIBAL )JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ?Yes.Whether reportable ?Yes.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : I. T. A. No. 372 of 2015
Reserved On : July 28, 2016 Pronounced On : December 23, 2016
Susham Singla
vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
....Appellant
....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.
* * *
Present :Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocateand Ms. Divya Suri, Advocatefor the appellant(s).
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the respondent(s).
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. :
For judgment, see order of even date passed in I. T. A. No. 371
of 2015– Susham Singla vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Patiala.
( S. J. VAZIFDAR ) CHIEF JUSTICE
December 23, 2016
monika
( DEEPAK SIBAL )JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned ?Yes.Whether reportable ?Yes.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue