Case LawHigh Court › Sushil Gupta (A.y. 2016-17) v. Assistant...

Sushil Gupta (A.y. 2016-17) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle

High Court 22 Dec 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sushil Gupta (A.y. 2016-17) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
22 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Sushil Gupta (A.y. 2016-17) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2882/2023 Sushil Gupta (A.y. 2016-17) S/o Shri Mata Deen Gupta, AgedAbout 62 Years, Resident Of Q-1/2, Lic Flats, Sector 6, VidyadharNagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302023. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4, NewCentral Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan - 302005.Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan - 302005. 2. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Central Board OfDirect Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (Nct)-110001Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (Nct)-110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Chattar. For Respondent(s): Mr. Ashish Kumar. : Mr. Rohan Chattar. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 22/12/2023 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. 2.The same is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J (ARUN BHANSALI),J PRADEEP KUMAR LIMBA /-88
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan